COVID-19 Survey: Early Results Reflect CPGs’ Current Resolve, Future Uncertainty

At press time, survey responses indicate that companies producing packaged goods are handling the disruptions, and though strained, supply chains remain intact. But when asked to forecast the future, there’s less consensus.

Covid19 Getty Images 1205740031

In response to COVID-19, Packaging World magazine polled readers who are Consumer Packaged Goods companies or brand owners to begin to see how the industry was dealing with the crisis. The survey was sent via e-mail to a targeted audience between March 26-30, netting highly qualified responses from food and beverage, healthcare, cosmetics, personal care, and other packaged goods manufacturers. Removing any self-identified suppliers from the data set left 111 respondents that are highly representative of the CPG packaging industry. Job duties ranged from engineers to package design and development, but the largest portion, at 24% of all responses, were CEOs or senior management.

Chart 1—Respondents’ job functionChart 1—Respondents’ job functionWe first asked if people were coming into the plant or office or working from home. 62% of respondents are still coming into the office, with the remaining 38% working from home. It should be noted that the lion’s share of respondents (81%) come from the food and beverage industry, with others in healthcare packaging, so most respondents’ industries are deemed essential by the government. Of industries surveyed, Food and Beverage was most likely to still be coming into the plant, which stands to reason.

When we looked more closely at job duty, we found that CEOs and upper management were just as likely to be coming into the office as plant floor workers, operators, engineers, etc.

Food is essential, others refit for aid production
An impressive 19% of respondents are either in the process of refitting or retooling their manufacturing, or considering doing so, in support of production to help governmental and health organizations with respirators, masks, or other critical healthcare materials relevant to suppressing the spread of COVID-19.

On Friday, March 27, while survey data was being collected from the Packaging World audience, the White House indicated it would fully invoke the Defense Production Act, potentially compelling private sector manufacturers to produce essential healthcare materials, both PPE (personal protection equipment) and ventilators.

But at the time of this analysis, only General Motors has been asked, and not yet compelled, to comply. Still, 12% of Packaging World survey respondents already are doing so, and another 7% are discussing ways to do so. Again, 81% of respondents are in the food and beverage industry, so they are likely ill-equipped to switch production to safety masks, gloves, or ventilators, plus most are already producing an essential product. For most, both of those are true.

Chart 2—Are you working from home or coming into the plant/office?Chart 2—Are you working from home or coming into the plant/office?Where food manufacturers might be making some changes in the coming months is in SKU reduction or product mix adjustment. We asked them how their companies would cope if government shutdowns continue for months into the future. Many said they will be attempting to maximize production by streamlining their product range and allowing themselves longer runs of single products deemed essential or especially fitting for the current landscape (for instance, nutritious but non-luxury SKUs). Illustrating this, respondents said they would cope by:

“Adjusting product mix for maximum efficiency.” Or “Managing min/max inventory levels and constantly communicating with vendors.”

One exception worth noting is that both cosmetics manufacturers and distilleries (see sidebar above) have been leaders in switching production from high-end spirits and perfumes to hand sanitizer, since they are so well-equipped and motivated to do so. Meanwhile, many OEMs—thermoforming machine builders, for instance, who can make dies and thermoform shapes like masks—have similarly switched some production to the COVID-19 medical relief effort. Also upstream, there have been many notable cases of packaging materials providers or converters rerouting polymers for protective masks. In fact, this has caused some worry among brands who fear packaging material supply disruption. More on that a little further below.

Supply chain disruption?
Speaking of supply chains, a remarkable 53% of respondents say that supply chains have not been disrupted, at least not in the short term. One respondent added:

“Only a small portion of our supply chain is affected; some ingredient delays and sanitizer shortages,” and another said “Ingredients were initially the issue, but our carriers have since bounced back. Otherwise, it has been surprisingly good for us.”

But on the other side of that coin, of the remaining 46 respondents (47% of all survey-takers) who had experienced supply chain disruption, 24 (23% of all survey-takers) identified raw materials and ingredients sourcing as a problem, and 12 (11% of all survey-takers) identified packaging materials sourcing as a problem. In their words:

“Ingredients and packaging material lead times have been increased exponentially,” and “ingredients and packaging material [are hard to source because] vendors are running limited production and because of other ingredients to make semi-finished goods.”

On the positive side, machinery seems to be a bright spot, with only 2 respondents in 111 saying that spare parts have been a problem, along with a few mentions of OEM shipments being late due to logistics and trucking disruptions, mostly from offshore sources.

Looking forward
Despite the positive tone about how well the supply chain has held up so far, the future is less certain to respondents. When asked how they will keep up with business in the future if restrictions remain in place for more than 2-3 months, such stark responses as:

“May not survive,”

were entered on the survey. Those, though, are balanced by more optimistic, though pragmatic, answers. For instance, one respondent said:

“As long as ingredients/materials continue to come in and our clients are still taking product away, we don’t really see any issues with a longer restriction. The core issue would be the morale of our employees. 2-3 months is a long time to be under a shelter in place situation.”

The most representative and repeated (in spirit, at least) answer to the question about what the future holds was:

“Do not know yet. Everything is very fluid!”

Uncertainty around human and capital assets
That sort of uncertainty was prevalent when respondents were asked about anything forward-looking. When asked if hiring and interviewing are frozen, respondents were split down the middle, with 49% of responding companies having such practices on hold, and the other 51% continuing on with personnel acquisition.

Nearly the same story can be told about capital expenditures—55% of respondents report that capital expenditures are on temporary hold, with the remaining 45% saying they aren’t on hold. The division of answers in these two categories illustrates the lack of certainty or industry-wide agreement on what the future holds.

Perhaps the clearest evidence of this is crystalized in how respondents reacted when they were asked—this time in a multiple choice format—how they foresee future capital equipment buying habits. The majority of respondents, 57%, say that it’s too early to tell whether or not there will be any changes in capital equipment buying. Of the outliers to this opinion, 21% foresee limiting their capital expenditures, and 5% expect to expand them. And the remaining 17% foresee business-as-usual with regards to procuring equipment.

Of respondents saying they would be procuring more equipment, the following responses represented the reasons why:

“More automation [is] needed with less labor,” or “Product mix changes.”

that will precipitate new equipment.

Chart 3—Have your supply chains been disrupted?Chart 3—Have your supply chains been disrupted?Of respondents saying they will be doing less CAPEX, most cited an expectation for reduced production as the reason. Some interesting commentary could be found in the responses, though. Non-U.S. manufacturers drew the ire of one, saying:

“Currently some contractors, especially those overseas, cannot provide on-site support so capital projects are on hold,” or “Lack of capital means we’ll move to leasing.”

Pharmaceutical Innovations Report
Discover the latest breakthrough packaging technologies shaping the pharmaceutical sector. This report dives into cutting-edge innovations, from smart containers that enhance patient safety to eco-friendly materials poised to transform the industry’s sustainability practices. All from PACK EXPO. Learn how forward-thinking strategies are driving efficiency and redefining what’s possible in pharma packaging.
Learn More
Pharmaceutical Innovations Report
Coding, Marking, and Labeling Innovations Report
Explore our editor-curated report featuring cutting-edge coding, labeling, and RFID innovations from PACK EXPO 2024. Discover high-speed digital printing, sustainable label materials, automated labeling systems, and advanced traceability solutions that are transforming packaging operations across industries.
Access Report
Coding, Marking, and Labeling Innovations Report