Live from CPA Annual Meeting: CPGs Look for Flexibility, Transparency, and Innovation from Contract Packaging Partners

Co-pack/co-man customers B&G Foods and Bush Brothers share their reasons for employing CPCMs, what is important in a CPCM relationship, and some of their pet peeves.

Stepowany and Martin
Brian Stepowany, CPP, Packaging R&D, Senior Manager for B&G Foods, Inc. (l.) and Robby Martin, Sr. Commercialization Manager for Bush Brothers & Co.

The contract packaging/contract manufacturing (CPCM) market is experiencing tremendous growth, with a CAGR of 11.9% from 2013 to 2018. That’s according to the Contract Packaging Association’s 2018 “State of the Industry Report,” which forecast that by 2020, the CPCM market would break the $75 billion mark—a conservative number, it estimated—rising from $53.6 billion at year-end 2017.

Growing two- to four-times faster than the industries it supports, the CPCM market is taking on a range of new projects to help Consumer Packaged Goods companies address the proliferation of SKUs, the consumer desire for customized packaging, new package formats, and e-commerce, among other challenges.

Carl MelvilleCarl Melville, COO of The Melville Group, moderated the panel discussionAt the Contract Packaging Association’s Annual Meeting, held Feb. 19-21 in Tucson, Ariz., two CPCM customers shared with attendees during a panel discussion what they look for when evaluating potential CPCM partners and how best these companies can help them meet their goals. Providing perfect “bookends,” according to panel moderator Carl Melville, COO of The Melville Group, Brian Stepowany, CPP, Packaging R&D, Senior Manager for B&G Foods, Inc., and Robby Martin, Sr. Commercialization Manager for Bush Brothers & Co., respectively provided insights from a $2 billion, multi-brand business on the one end and from a smaller, family-owned company with one brand, on the other.

Despite the difference in the size of their companies, both CPGs shared that CPCMs allow them to bring to market new products they can’t or don’t want to produce in-house, as well as help them trial new product and package concepts before they invest in in-house capabilities.

Parsippany, N.J.-based B&G Foods offers more than 50 brands worldwide, among them Back to Nature, Cream of Wheat, Ortega, Mrs Dash, Clabber Girl, Durkee, and Green Giant. Noted Stepowany, B&G has 12 internal plants, works with 80 co-packers, and uses more than 100 different facilities. “We come out with new products every year,” he said. “So we’re always expanding. If the business is doing well, our plants are full. That’s why products are going outside.”

Not only is a lack of in-house capacity many times a reason B&G will engage a co-packer, but also, because a lot of its facilities are “old and antiquated,” it may be too costly to add the equipment to produce the new package in-house, Stepowany explained. “That’s generally where the co-packers come in, where we’re not going to spend the money internally when we can go to someone who already has those capabilities,” he said.

Bush Brothers, whose “bread and butter” is beans—including baked, “Grillin’,” chili, ingredient, fancy, and refried—is heavily invested in canning infrastructure at its East Tennessee-based manufacturing facility. “Co-packers, for us, are crucial to help us do what our infrastructure cannot. And our infrastructure is cans. So a lot of the other things we try get done outside,” said Martin. “We have to trust in the co-man to know what we don’t and to do what we can’t, or to do scales or sizes we don’t want to do.”

Honesty surrounding capabilities is key

Martin joined Bush in the early 2000s as part of its new internal R&D staff, created to leverage “everything the company could think of that had to do with beans,” he explained. Later the department became a vehicle to propel the company into what it will be next through innovation. Finding a CPCM willing to take the journey with Bush to trial a new product—even if it may ultimately fail—is a crucial consideration for the CPG in selecting a partner.

“Partly because of our size and partly because we’re trying things that are new to us, we don’t bring a lot of volume to the table day one,” explained Martin. “But let me just say that we are honest about that, and we’re going to pay for what you’re going to do for us.

“We walk in the door committing that if you take a project on with us, we are going to keep you whole. So if you are going to go and spend above ‘X’ amount to try to help me meet a project timeline or a test market timeline, I’m probably going to tell you to go ahead. And when I tell you to go ahead, it means that I’ll write the check if we don’t ever execute the test market or if it ends up selling 10 percent of what we expected. We try to deal with as much of that upfront as we can.

Is your palletizing solution leaving money on the floor?
Discover which palletizing technology—robotic, conventional, or hybrid—will maximize your packaging line efficiency while minimizing long-term costs in this comprehensive analysis.
Read More
Is your palletizing solution leaving money on the floor?
Researched List: Engineering Services Firms
Looking for engineering services? Our curated list features 100+ companies specializing in civil, process, structural, and electrical engineering. Many also offer construction, design, and architecture services. Download to access company names, markets served, key services, contact information, and more!
Download Now
Researched List: Engineering Services Firms