Discover your next big idea at PACK EXPO Las Vegas this September
Experience a breakthrough in packaging & processing and transform your business with solutions from 2,300 suppliers spanning all industries.
REGISTER NOW & SAVE

Reflections on package design research

How toβ€”and how not toβ€”conduct package design research for the best results.

Pw 8128 Sterling

For better package design research, you should use two categories of methodologies: those that rely on verbal or written responses and those that rely on behavior. Integrate them such that one verifies the other. For example, what participants say can be used to formulate theories of behavior that are tested through observation. Conversely, observed behavior must be interpreted and helpful to that task can be questions posed to the participant.

Talk is cheap. The majority of today’s package research relies on participants reporting their attitudes and opinions. A focus group, for example, can be planned and conducted within weeks, at modest cost. The same holds true for questionnaires, surveys, and interviews. 

Time and cost, while important, don’t by themselves justify the use of any particular methodology. Reliability (the degree to which the method yields results that are repeatable and consistent) and validity (the degree to which the method measures what it purports to measure), should be the determinants.

A common error is to have the participant respond beyond his/her capability, knowledge, or interests. Asking the participant to express a preference among design choices, for example, should not require that the participant turn designer or psychologist, nor should it be assumed that the participant cares about the matter nearly as much as you.

The participant is not a member of your team. It’s easy to lose sight of that truth when you’ve lived with the package since conception and have invested time, energy, and worry. The participant won’t match your emotional involvement and subjectivity, and it can prove disastrous for you to ignore your differences. In farming for participant attitudes and opinions, stay aware of the limitations of their responses and take nothing for gospel.

Be careful not to force the participant into giving an answer of β€œyes.” It’s being repeatedly done with inquires along the lines of, β€œWould you be willing to pay extra for a package that’s manufactured in an Earth-friendly way?” Might as well ask that participant whether he/she is for world peace; the response is as predictable.

In the preceding example, your cause isn’t furthered much by follow-up questions, such as, β€œHow much extra?” The participant simply might not know, not given to thinking in percentages, for instance. Or, the participant might give a generous answer, to appear conscientious and sacrificing, but would never make good at purchase time.

Annual Outlook Report: Workforce
Hiring remains a major challenge in packaging, with 78% struggling to fill unskilled roles and 84% lacking experienced workers. As automation grows, companies must rethink hiring and training. Download the full report for key insights.
Download Now
Annual Outlook Report: Workforce
Coding, Marking, and Labeling Innovations Report
Explore our editor-curated report featuring cutting-edge coding, labeling, and RFID innovations from PACK EXPO 2024. Discover high-speed digital printing, sustainable label materials, automated labeling systems, and advanced traceability solutions that are transforming packaging operations across industries.
Access Report
Coding, Marking, and Labeling Innovations Report