See What’s Possible in Packaging & Processing @ PACK EXPO International
See packaging & processing solutions from 2,600 exhibitors and gain insights from 150+ free educational sessions at PACK EXPO International.
REGISTER NOW & SAVE

Create a free Packaging World account to continue reading

What do pharmaceutical packagers want?

Representatives from Abbott Laboratories and Pharmacia seek simplicity in packaging machinery to help cut cost and time associated with the validation process.

Giuseppe Motta of Abbott Laboratories Italia used this cartoon analogy to illustrate the complicated validation process faced by
Giuseppe Motta of Abbott Laboratories Italia used this cartoon analogy to illustrate the complicated validation process faced by

Pharmaceutical packagers need help complying with increasingly burdensome process-validation requirements to comply with FDA and other governmental regulatory organizations, according to representatives from Pharmacia and Abbott Laboratories Italia who presented at the Heart of Packaging symposium held in Bologna, Italy, in late September.

Robert Martell of Pharmacia, Kalamazoo, MI, said packaging machine builders can help reduce the cost and time it takes to implement packaging FDA-compliance requirements for each product. He said controlling validation costs, which can range from 10% to 40% of an entire project’s cost, is critical.

To explain the difficulty pharmaceutical companies face in validating machinery, Giuseppe Motta of Abbott Laboratories Italia used a car mechanic as an example. He said car mechanics have standard components, such as a wrench to adjust car parts. Pharmaceutical engineers, however, need different “wrenches” to adjust different machines to each product requirement (see illustration). This leads to a much more complicated validation process.

According to Martell, machinery builders can help simplify the validation process by leveraging servo capability, building upon industry-standard platforms, and integrating logic and motion controls in a single-control environment. As for design methodology, Martell said a clear representation of all machine states, industry-standard software, and a well-documented design approach can go a long way.

As an example of a standard design methodology, Martell specifically referred to the state model being developed by OMAC’s PackML team. The model describes whether a packaging machine is running, down, on standby, etc. Machines that are PackML-aware can reduce the time it takes to integrate on a packaging line. If PackML is widely adopted by automation suppliers and machine builders, it can standardize the way machines are integrated on a line, no matter the type of product being packaged or the location of the plant. For the pharmaceutical industry, such standardization can theoretically lead to simpler validation, according to Martell.

Both Martell and Motta mentioned that the path to easier validation could be shortened by more collaboration between original equipment manufacturers, technology suppliers, and end users.

For an overview of the "Heart of Packaging" conferences, see: packworld.com/go/w043

Is your packaging line built for connected packaging?
RFID, QR codes, and 2D barcodes are reshaping CPG operations. See how leading brands are adapting.
Read More
Is your packaging line built for connected packaging?
Need help with your packaging project?
We’ve done the legwork to identify and vet experienced packaging and processing consultants you can contact directly for your next project. Decades of combined experience in packaging line engineering, machinery selection, package and materials development, and food processing operations.
See your advisor options now.
Need help with your packaging project?