Trebla 'develops' pouch for U.S., foreign markets

U.S. maker of photoprocessing liquids moves to a stand-up, handled pouch pre-made in Switzerland. With its thicker LLDPE/adhesive/nylon structure, the film allows the pour-spouted pouch to better withstand shipping rigors than a previous version.

Trebla?s 2-L stand-up pouches are filled through their pour spouts at rates of 16/min, which is the total output of four filling
Trebla?s 2-L stand-up pouches are filled through their pour spouts at rates of 16/min, which is the total output of four filling

Another stand-up pouch for liquids that's expected to ship to various global markets in the next few months comes from St. Louis, MO-based Trebla Chemical Co. Trebla manufactures and markets developers, bleach kits and other liquids used in photoprocessing. These products are sold to industrial/commercial accounts, such as one-hour photo labs.

Beginning last November, Trebla began filling 2-L quantities of three photochemistry product formulas into pre-made stand-up pouches manufactured by Elag Packaging Ltd. (Kirchberg, Switzerland). Elag is represented in the U.S. by Developmental Concepts (Fenton, MO). The single-use pouches include both a die-cut handle and pour spout.

The linear low-density polyethylene/nylon pouch structure for the three formulas is similar, while the inner LLDPE sealant layer can vary in thickness depending on product density; typically it's 8.66 mils. A proprietary adhesive is used to join the LLDPE to an 80-ga layer of nylon that provides toughness for shipping.

This particular structure replaced a 48-ga polyester/adhesive/7.8-mil LLDPE material from a supplier in Germany. Trouble was, that material developed pinholes at various pinch or fold points in the pouch that lead to failures during drop testing.

Why doesn't Trebla purchase material from a U.S. supplier and reduce its shipping costs? According to Trebla's vice president and general manager Brian Barbo, "We spent more than a year trying to find a film supplier stateside that could help us meet the UN testing specifications we need to meet for shipping. When you put two liters of a liquid mass in a pouch and drop it thirty inches off a table, you don't want it to burst. In the U.S., we ship though a distribution network that uses [a major parcel delivery carrier]. During handling and shipping, we realize that much heavier parcels get dropped on cases of our product, so the packaging has to be able to withstand those kinds of rigors.

"The thickest polyethylene film we could find in the states was about six mils," he continues. "And that's not thick enough. Our pouches would just blow apart at that thickness. Another drawback we found was that most U.S. film converters use adhesive laminations that generally can't withstand the UN testing that stresses the material by subjecting the film to cold temperatures."

Videos from Universal Labeling Systems, Inc.
Is your palletizing solution leaving money on the floor?
Discover which palletizing technology—robotic, conventional, or hybrid—will maximize your packaging line efficiency while minimizing long-term costs in this comprehensive analysis.
Read More
Is your palletizing solution leaving money on the floor?
Annual Outlook Report: Automation & Robotics
What's in store for CPGs in 2025 and beyond? <i>Packaging World</i> editors explore the survey responses from 118 brand owners, CPG, and FMCG <i>Packaging World</i> readers for its new Annual Outlook Report.
Download
Annual Outlook Report: Automation & Robotics