Where have all the leaders gone?

Editor’s note: Mike Richmond was inducted into the Packaging Hall of Fame during this past Pack Expo International.

Pw 2476 Richmond

I was lucky enough to grow up in packaging during the 80s and 90s, a period when packaging was starting to be recognized as a fundamental component in the overall product equation. We still did not have a seat at the management or marketing tables, but exciting things were happening all around us—the approval of aseptic packaging of fluids, the emergence of two-liter plastic beverage bottles, and the growth of retort pouches and microwavable packaging, to name a few.

What we saw in that period was significant technical, marketing, and distribution resources being applied to packaging-driven projects. The resources came from many directions, too, including suppliers, converters, brand owners, packaging associations, and academia. Vocal and visible leaders reminded the packaging community how important it was to listen carefully and early on to what consumers were saying about packaging. Those same leaders pushed for performance testing and backed the development of new and improved materials and package formats. Technical ladders in R&D departments allowed leading packaging people to pursue ambitious projects and be rewarded for their technical accomplishments. Training and education, it’s worth noting, were widely available for packaging professionals.

But sometime in the 90s, the bottom line became the only thing that mattered. As mergers and acquisitions became common, packaging was one of the first places where reductions were made. More and more companies started implementing the Stage-Gate product development process, which really hurt packaging since every timeline was too short for packaging to make a difference. An overemphasis on supply chain economics hurt, too. It seemed packaging professionals could do anything they wanted as long as the end result looked like the old package, did not cost any more, and ran the same on existing packaging equipment. As if that were not enough, the packaging community’s strongest visionaries and most thoughtful leaders began retiring, so training and education—not to mention mentoring—became all but nonexistent.

It’s time for packaging professionals to solidify our place at the leadership and growth table. We need to rethink how packaging can take on the leadership role it needs to for all of us to succeed. These are among the things that should be high on our to-do lists:

Is your palletizing solution leaving money on the floor?
Discover which palletizing technology—robotic, conventional, or hybrid—will maximize your packaging line efficiency while minimizing long-term costs in this comprehensive analysis.
Read More
Is your palletizing solution leaving money on the floor?
Conveying Innovations Report
Editors report on distinguishing characteristics that define each new product and collected video demonstrating the equipment or materials as displayed at the show. This topical report, winnowed from nearly 300 PACK EXPO collective booth visits, represents a categorized, organized account of individual items that were selected based on whether they were deemed to be both new, and truly innovative, based on decades of combined editorial experience in experiencing and evaluating PACK EXPO products.
Take me there
Conveying Innovations Report