Food-contact packaging is often considered a secondary additive by federal regulators. For the past several years, opponents of Delaney have been attempting to eliminate its zero-tolerance standard. The clause was written at a time when substances could not be measured with the resolution that's possible with current technology. Today's sensitive measuring equipment can detect up to parts per trillion of a substance; at that resolution, many additives that were previously acceptable now fall under the purview of the Delaney Clause. Delaney opponents would replace the zero-tolerance standard with a negligible risk standard. But controversy has arisen over what constitutes "negligible risk." Some consumer groups oppose any weakening of Delaney. Republicans have tried to blunt criticism of the negligible risk criterion in a major pesticide reform bill that would affect crops used by food processors. Their strategy was to include language allowing the Environmental Protection Agency to set a standard for the use of pesticides that is "safe." No word yet on whether Democrats will accept this concession.
Delaney nearing revision
The longstanding battle to reform the decades-old Delaney Clause, which prohibits the use of any carcinogenic additive in processed food, is moving forward in Congress.
Jul 31, 1996
Machinery Basics
Coding, Marking, and Labeling Innovations Report
Explore our editor-curated report featuring cutting-edge coding, labeling, and RFID innovations from PACK EXPO 2024. Discover high-speed digital printing, sustainable label materials, automated labeling systems, and advanced traceability solutions that are transforming packaging operations across industries.
Access Report
Annual Outlook Report: Sustainability
The road ahead for CPGs in 2025 and beyond—<i>Packaging World</i> editors review key findings from a survey of 88 brand owners, CPG, and FMCG readers.
Download Now