Alert: Packaging World now enhanced for the iPad and iPhone. Watch a quick video preview
Article |

Safety concerns continue for genetically modified foods

Chicago-based American Medical Association (AMA, www.ama-assn.org) rekindled more concern about labeling—and, thus, consumption—of genetically engineered (GE) foods made from genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
Print Reprint
FILED IN:  Trends and Issues  > Food safety
     

On June 19, at its 2012 Annual Convention in Chicago, AMA’s House of Delegates revised its policy on labeling of GMO foods. In what the Los Angeles Times (LAT) reports, on June 21, as an AMA 500-or-so-word statement, the medical association said,

“There is no scientific justification for special labeling of bioengineered foods, as a class, and that voluntary labeling is without value unless it is accompanied by focused consumer education.” Note: When the newspaper published its story and Automation World began its publication process on this article, the AMA had not yet published that statement on its Web site.

Further, according to the newspaper, AMA’s Dr. Patrice Harris said through an e-mail statement, “Recognizing the public’s interest in the safety of bioengineered foods, the new policy also supports mandatory FDA pre-market systemic safety assessments of these foods as a preventive measure to ensure the health of the public.”

In a June 19 press release, however, Yonkers, N.Y.-headquartered Consumers Union (CU, www.consumersunion.com) questioned the AMA’s action. “We wholeheartedly commend AMA for coming out in support of mandatory premarket safety assessment of GE foods, but are disappointed that AMA did not also support mandatory labeling,” said CU senior scientist Dr. Michael Hansen.

“The AMA’s stance on mandatory labeling isn’t consistent with its support for mandatory pre-market safety assessments,” Hansen explained. “If unexpected adverse health effects happen as a result of GE, then labeling could perhaps be the only way to determine that the GE process was linked to the adverse health effect.”

Comments(1)

Comments

i question the 'lack of scientific justification' for labelling genetically engineered products. I have a list of recent studies that show the effects of eating gm corn on 4 generations of mice; a Danish pig farmer whose research on his farm indicated that feeding gm soy adversely affects his animals' health and instigated a European Union study which is now going on; many more.

Add new comment

ADVERTISEMENT
E-BOOK SPECIAL REPORT
42 Best Package Designs
Sign up to receive timely updates from our editors and download this e-book consisting of our editors' picks of most notable package designs. Updated for 2014!
x

Newsletters

Don't miss intelligence crucial to your job and business!
Click on any newsletter to view a sample. Enter your email address below to sign up!
GENERAL INTEREST
PACKAGE DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT
Each newsletter ranges in frequency from once per month to a few times per month at most.