Download this free, 93-page Package Development Playbook jam-packed with strategies for success, best practices, and pitfalls to avoid. Learn more »»
Read More on:
Package Type > Containers
Package design > Design tools
Machine Product Brief
Package design > Rigid-to-flexible
Feature Article
Article |
March 26, 2012
Send to Kindle
Send to KindleBalancing risk with innovation
One of the major roles of the packaging R&D function is to identify and address all the risk areas in a project, one by one. A willingness to try new materials and package formats—even at the risk of commercial failure—can be a price worth paying for innovation.
By
There are as many approaches to market-testing new packages as there are companies. One well-known retailer, for instance, skips consumer testing entirely when launching new private label packaging. Instead, it just launches new packages. The pack’s success or failure in the marketplace is the test. Another consumer packaged goods (CPG) company purposely invents temporary brands to test new concepts without risking any damage to the real brand’s equity; if the package format succeeds, the temporary brand is replaced with the actual brand.
When trying new or unproven technologies, such examples make a strong case that it’s a good idea to relax your standards, or at least strict adherence to past practices, in the name of innovation. Build-in time for working-out kinks, and be willing to run any unfamiliar or experimental materials or machines more slowly at the outset.
Comparing a promising new technology to a mature one that’s had 30 years of cost engineered out of it is unrealistic. New technology always has inherent risks that may or may not be known or solved yet. Balance the risk against the benefits.
Which companies are most likely to blaze a trail? Innovative packaging formats are often implemented by small start-up or entrepreneurial CPG concerns. This seems to be a byproduct of their agility. It’s easier for a small company to change a packaging or marketing
strategy; there’s less to lose and more to gain by taking market share from a larger CPG counterpart.
When the proverbial David fells a large CPG Goliath, it’s often because the large firm was unable to bend its infrastructure and older capital assets top the will of a new, large scale packaging change.
At the same time, the most powerful innovators who dominate the marketplace are often at the top or approaching the top of their field. Many of them can be working on similar ideas, but only one can be first to market. How do they commercialize an innovation quickly? By allowing some risk-taking to coexist with all the research and analysis. Every year, many of the best-planned new products fail. When failure happens, learn from it.
Whether small start-up or established leader, however, the common thread among those that innovate is that they are driven to do so, and willing to take risks in order to reap the rewards. They don’t follow trends so much as make them, because it’s impossible to lead if you’re following – or to be original if you’re copying. Those companies with ability to drive the market seem to have innovation embedded in their corporate culture. They understand that playing it safe can result in a failure much more devastating than packaging: having your competitors pass you by.
E-BOOK SPECIAL REPORT
45 Best Package Designs
Sign up to receive timely updates from our editors and download this e-book consisting of our editors' picks of most notable package designs.
Comments(0)
Add new comment