Alert: Packaging World now enhanced for the iPad and iPhone. Watch a quick video preview
 
Download this free, 114-page End-of-Line Equipment Playbook jam-packed with strategies for success, best practices, and pitfalls to avoid.  Learn more >>
 
This content was submitted directly to this Web site by the supplier.
White Paper |

How to cost-justify automatic stretch wrapping

Automated stretch wrapping is actually cheaper than doing it manually. Click here to receive white paper from Wulftec that provides cost justification.
Print Reprint
FILED IN:  Machinery  > Stretch wrapping
     

Are you still manually wrapping loads because you think a stretch-wrapping machine is too costly for your current needs? You might want to do a little math before dismissing this option.

If you're manually stretch-wrapping loads, you already know it's tedious, time-consuming and downright exhausting. You probably also realize it's difficult to ensure a very tight wrap, which means load security and protection are questionable at best. Manually wrapped products have a greater chance of being damaged during transport or storage—something no business can afford.

Download white paper

This content is sponsored by the supplier. Your contact information may be shared with this sponsor, as detailed in our Privacy Policy. Your contact information will not shared with a sponsor whose content you have not reviewed.
ADVERTISEMENT

Newsletters

Don't miss intelligence crucial to your job and business!
Click on any newsletter to view a sample. Enter your email address below to sign up!
GENERAL INTEREST
PACKAGE DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT
Each newsletter ranges in frequency from once per month to a few times per month at most.

indicates a sponsored article that was submitted directly to this web site by the supplier, and was not handled by the PW editorial staff. Packaging World may share your contact information with our sponsors, as detailed in our Privacy Policy. Packaging World will not share your information with a sponsor whose content you have not reviewed.