- Contract Packaging
- Leaders in Packaging
Article | December 31, 2001
PipeLine: Size does matter
With apologies to Dr. Ruth, I think youll agree that, in many areas, size can be an important advantage.
Usually bigger is better especially if youre in the market for more capital. In other matters issues such as taxes and dental cavities smaller is better. And it must also be true in contract packaging. This months special report shows that most of contract packaging companies that participated in our survey are companies smaller than many of their clients. Yet their growth is undeniable; its not only borne out by our research but other surveys show strong shifts of packaging from manufacturers to outsourced companies of every kind. These range from small sheltered workshops to very specialized high-technology companies. The key word here may be specialized. Its unlikely that contract packagers will take much business away from high-output packaging operations that can operate profitably on minuscule margins. Why are so many foods like Campbell Soups still sold in tinplate cans and glass containers? Because those packages deliver a dependable product at a very inexpensive price. Many of those can- or jar-filling lines were paid for generations ago. And while these package styles are not the first place youd look for packaging innovations two-piece cans full-panel easy-open lids and new decorating and labeling technologies are just some of the incremental package improvements in recent years. Campbell Soup certainly has introduced new alternatives to cans and glass jars with prepared soups in plastic jars. But which package styles sell the highest volumes for them? Check the soup aisle at virtually any supermarket. However when you look at say refrigerated or frozen soups youll find some in flexible stand-up pouches. Although not high-volume products this unusual package style can be profitable too. Are all of these products packed in-house? No this is an example of the kind of specialization that makes outsourcing of packaging so desirable for many companies. Does this mean there are contract packagers just waiting for business with stand-up pouch filling equipment? Not necessarily. Sure some companies have that capability. But based on anecdotal evidence I believe that muchmaybe mostof this volume goes through co-packers companies that already operate this type of equipment for their own products. In the past many companies that invested in unusual or innovative packaging techniques were reluctant about taking on outside business. They believed that more products available in their unique package would dilute the distinctiveness of their own product/package concept. Other companieseven those without a unique packagesimply would refuse to entertain outside business for a wide variety of reasons. Today the measurement of capacity utilization plays an increasing role in the profitability equation. In other words by taking on outside packaging business to augment its own production a manufacturer can see surprising increases in uptime on its packaging equipment. And in some cases this extra business looks to be almost pure profit especially if it can be handled by labor already in place. The reluctance of manufacturers to co-pack for other companies hasnt completely disappeared. But my guess is that co-packing accounts for a very significant part of the contract packaging growth. And companies that co-pack may be every bit as large as their contract clients. Perhaps this explains why there are so many partnerships between the two parties. Big or small? As you can see the new improved Packaging World believes that smaller is better and more convenient. For years readers have told us the magazines only drawback was its physical size. Publisher Joe Angel addresses this on p. 8. Wed love to hear your comments.
E-BOOK SPECIAL REPORT
44 Best Package Designs: 2015
Sign up to receive timely updates from our editors and download this e-book of our editors’ selections for most innovative package designs of the past year.