Article |

Bioplastics feedstock not in competition with food, reveals data

The feedstock needed for bioplastics production accounts for only a minimal fraction of global agricultural area, according to new data published by European Bioplastics.
Print Reprint
FILED IN:  Sustainability  > Bioplastics

The surface required to grow sufficient feedstock for today’s bioplastic production is less than 0.006% of the global agricultural area of 5 billion hectares. This is the key finding published by European Bioplastics, based on figures from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and calculations of the Institute for Bioplastics and Biocomposites (IfBB, University Hannover, Germany).

In a world of fast-growing population with an increasing demand for food and feed, the use of feedstock for non-food purposes is often debated controversially. The new brochure “Bioplastics - facts and figures” published by European Bioplastics, is said to move the discussion on to a factual level.

Of the 13.4 billion hectares of global land surface, around 37% (5 billion hectares) are currently used for agriculture. This includes pastures (70 %, approximately 3.5 billion hectares) and arable land (30%, approximately 1.4 billion hectare).

Related Sponsored Content

This 30% of arable land is further divided into areas predominantly used to grow crops for food and feed (27%, approximately 1.29 billion hectares), as well as crops for materials (2%, approximately 100 million hectares, including the share used for bioplastics), and crops for biofuels (1%, approximately 55 million hectares).

European Bioplastics market data depicts production capacities of around 1.2 million tonnes in 2011. This translates to approximately 300,000 hectares of land use to grow feedstock for bioplastics. In relation to the global agricultural area of 5 billion hectares, bioplastics make use of only 0.006%. Metaphorically speaking, this ratio correlates to the size of an average cherry tomato placed next to the Eiffel Tower.

No competition to food and feed
According to European Bioplastics, a glance at the global agricultural area and the way it is used makes it abundantly clear: 0.006% used to grow feedstock for bioplastics is nowhere near being in competition with the 98% used for pastures and to grow food and feed.

European Bioplastics notes that increasing the efficiency of feedstock and agricultural technology will be key to assuring the balance between land use for innovative bioplastics and land for food and feed. The emergence of reliable and independent sustainability assessment schemes will also contribute to this goal.



It's a pity they don't project the land usage were a wholesale shift away from petrochemicals to bio-plastics undertaken. That way we could understand the impact of pursuing bio-plastics in the long term. Also, what will the by-products of fuel distillation be used for in the future if they are not converted into polymers? Will they just be burned as fuel oil? As with most things in life there will be a balance and it is wise to understand that balance before we charge off in one direction or another.

If you believe the above article, then please call me. I have have a great deal on the Brooklyn Bridge and can sell it cheap. This is just another example of green washing. Two years ago, Smithfield Farms, a major pig producer, went into chapter 11. The company President stated it was not due to the economy, it was due to the high cost of feed. Last year, Smithfield bought ALL of its corn from Brazil. What does that tell you about its availability and cost??

Add new comment

42 Best Package Designs
Sign up to receive timely updates from our editors and download this e-book consisting of our editors' picks of most notable package designs. Updated for 2014!


Don't miss intelligence crucial to your job and business!
Click on any newsletter to view a sample. Enter your email address below to sign up!
Each newsletter ranges in frequency from once per month to a few times per month at most.